The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, etc., the punishment (one million won of punishment) of the lower judgment is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. As to the case in which only the judgment of the defendant was made or on behalf of the defendant, the court failed to sentence more severe punishment than the judgment of the court below (Article 368 of the Criminal Procedure Act), and as to the case in which only the defendant appealed, it cannot change the sentence disadvantageous to the defendant, the defendant's assertion that the sentence of imprisonment not only is a fine but also is applied to the defendant is without merit.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit and thus dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure)

1. Article 70 (1) 3 of the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business (a stolen credit card use) of the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business is clear that it is a clerical error under Article 70 (1) 3 of the Act on Special Credit Financial Business (including stolen credit cards use, and inclusive use).