1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Since February 2012 and March 2013, the Plaintiffs continued to reclaim part of the Defendant’s land and the Plaintiff’s land over two occasions, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) the Defendant obstructed drainage route where the Defendant had naturally flowed into the Defendant’s land from this point; (b) the Plaintiffs’ land contamination by using soil inappropriate for farming company; and (c) 224glus of the Plaintiffs’ trees, such as ice trees, tree, and pine trees, which were planted on the Plaintiff’s ground; and (b) the Defendant had the obligation to pay the Plaintiffs KRW 21,286,00 for the cost of planting trees 224gs again to the Plaintiffs; (c) construction cost of KRW 2,268,00 for the Plaintiff’s multiple drainage method; and (d) cost of removing and covering the black soil filled by the Defendant with earth and sand 2,400,000 won (=21,286,200,2006,208 won).

The defendant's execution of reclamation works on the land adjacent to the land owned by the plaintiffs, the fact that the plaintiffs moved part of the trees owned by the plaintiffs, and the fact that some of the trees owned by the plaintiffs were dead does not conflict between the parties.

However, the evidence submitted by the plaintiffs alone prevents drainage due to the defendant's reclamation work.

The fact that land owned by or owned by the plaintiffs was contaminated, the fact that trees owned by the plaintiffs were dead, the kinds and quantity of dead trees are insufficient to recognize, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.