Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant 1, “2017 High 945, Defendant 1, who visited Maart, and the victim C ( South, 66 years old) is Mart business owner.

on February 18, 2017. 16:36 on February 18, 2017, the Defendant taken up two Co., Ltd. from E located in Ansan-si, Nowon-si.

In addition, the tenant and tobacco were changed to the credit.

In addition, the victim refused this and brought the victim again, and the defendant was added to the defendant, and the victim's removal is rootsd, and the victim's removal is 2 Byung, and the victim's market price was 3,000 won.

On December 22, 2016, the Defendant, around 2017, 2016, moved in F apartment E in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, a member-si, and broken off 50 emptys that brought about by Mart operator G with the desire to “Cyp chrop, kine,” on the ground that he did not exchange an empty space that he/she has collected with a new owner.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by force, interfered with the operation of Mat by the victims of approximately 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 High Court Decision 945]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. On-site photographs and CCTV-related photographs (2017, ancient 946);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and C;

1. Receipt for the alcoholic beverage price;

1. On-site photographs, on-site photographs of the suspect A business obstruction, and tables of crimes;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (to hear statements of a victim C- additional evidence, existence of additional evidence, and victim specification);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;