logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.10.17 2017나53699
임대차보증금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the judgment as stipulated in paragraph (2) below. Thus, it is acceptable to cite it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. In a case where it is recognized that the seal affixed on the document of this case concerning the determination of the formal evidence evidence of the lease agreement (No. 1) in addition, is a affixed with the seal of the name holder, unless there are special circumstances, it is presumed that the act of affixing the seal was done based on the name holder's intention. On the other hand, if the authenticity of the seal is presumed to have been completed, it is presumed that the document was made without the intention of the name holder's signature or the name holder's consent, and thus, it is presumed that the document was made without the defendant's actual proof against the intention of the name holder's written lease agreement and the probative value of evidence of this case is not sufficient to see the defendant's assertion that the document of this case is a legal act of G.

arrow