A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 6, 2006, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million from the Busan District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 as a fine for the same crime in the same court on April 28, 2009, and a summary order of KRW 7 million from the Busan District Court's Dong Branch on March 11, 2014 to the same crime.

Criminal facts

1. Around 03:40 on July 12, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving a sound driving) and the Road Traffic Act (driving a driver without a license) driving a B-hand car with the blood alcohol concentration of about 0.094% while under the influence of alcohol, without obtaining a driver’s license, at a section of about 3km from the front of a restaurant in the trade name unfluench in Busan-dong, Busan-gu to the front of the Yellow-gu, Seocheon-dong.

As a result, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving at least twice, and drives a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver's license under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

2. On July 12, 2016, around 03:57, the Defendant signed the name of “E” at least for the purpose of verifying the content of the Defendant and signing a signature on the driver’s signature, on the following grounds: (a) the police officer D belonging to C of the Busan Southern Police Station C of the Busan Southern Police Station entered the results of the crackdown on drinking driving under paragraph (1) into PDA of the Traffic Police Service Management System; and (b) the Defendant requested the confirmation of the content and signing on the driver’s signature column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant forged the signature of the E without authority, and exercised it by transmitting the results of the drinking driving control to the traffic police service management system.

3. The Defendant forged a private document and displayed a falsified document at the time and place specified in paragraph (2) and indicated the name of “E” in the report on the state of the driver’s parliamentary statement in the manner described above.

This is the defendant.