1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) contracted the “F New Construction Work” by E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) (hereinafter “Defendant C”) to the Defendant D, a constructor who was unregistered on October 2, 2017, subcontracted the part of the instant construction work to the Defendant D.

B. Defendant D employed the Plaintiffs in KRW 200,000 per day for the above worship work.

Plaintiff

A from March 4, 2018

3. From 10 days to 13.

3. 11. excluding 11. Day, 9 days in case of Plaintiffs B and March 4, 2018:

3.6. to 3.0

3. up to 10.0:

3.12.

3. On the 13th construction site, the instant labor was provided for eight days.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers for those with additional numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, Defendant D is an employer who employs the plaintiffs, and Defendant C is jointly and severally liable to pay the plaintiff A wages of 1.8 million won (=200,000 won x 9 days), 1.6 million won to the plaintiff B’s wages (=200,000 won x 8 days) and 14 days after the termination of the employment relationship between the plaintiffs and the defendant D with respect to each of the above amounts, and is liable to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum as stipulated in the Labor Standards Act from April 15, 2018 to the day of full payment.

3. As to Defendant C’s assertion, Defendant C paid the construction cost under the said subcontract, including the wages of workers, to Defendant D, and Defendant D did not enter the Plaintiffs in the statement of labor cost payment submitted to Defendant C, and the Plaintiffs asserted that, in collusion with Defendant C, the Plaintiffs did not provide labor at the construction site of this case, the Plaintiffs did not demand payment of false wages against Defendant C.

However, the above evidence and the statements of the defendant D.