The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On May 9, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to 20 years of imprisonment with prison labor for murder, etc. by the Supreme Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the same day.

At around 18:00 on December 15, 2007, the Defendant: (a) “D” store operated by Sungnam-si A-6 Victim C, Sungnam-si, A-6, A-6, the Defendant demanded a refund; (b) the Defendant was at trial for the reason that the victim C refused a refund; (c) was pushed the victim C’s body in his hand; (d) was tightly cut down the victim E face; (e) 1 time after the victim E; (c) the victim E faces the left side of the victim F under this paragraph; (d) the victim C was able to look back to the victim E; (e) the victim F’s unfforcing for the number of days of treatment; and (e) the victim C’s unfforcing f for the number of days of treatment; and (e) the victim F was killed with the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E, C, or F;

1. A photograph of damage (the 46 pages of investigation records);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry of criminal records and investigation records, and application of a copy of judgment;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The latter part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act exempted from punishment (to exempt the accused from punishment in this case in consideration of equity in the case of concurrent judgment with the case of murder, etc. committed in a final judgment);