The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant shall be treated with sexual assault for 80 hours.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (such as imprisonment with prison labor for a period of 6 years, 80 hours and orders to complete sexual assault treatment programs) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant, who prepared in advance, committed a crime of rapeing the victim by making the victimized party unable to resist by having the injured party breath an exemption from water containing the ingredients by a stroke m, which is a stroke-type mental medicine prepared in advance, and caused the victim to do so more than three months.

The defendant and the victim are commercial and subordinate employees working for the same company. The defendant seems to abuse his position or the victim's trust so that they can lead to each of the crimes of this case. The same crime has been repeated over a considerable period of time, and the nature of the crime is very poor in light of the type of a local mental medicine used by the defendant, the details of the crime, and the method of the crime.

The victim appears to have suffered a big physical mental shock and pain, along with a considerable sexual humiliation, due to each of the crimes in this case by the defendant. In fact, the victim suffered a mental suffering, such as receiving treatment of pharmacologic treatment, psychological consultation, etc. after receiving a diagnosis of "the trauma stress disorder or the depression of scarcity," even until now, and the victim seems to have suffered economic damage, such as being unable to maintain a livelihood as he/she is unable to live more at work due to the occurrence of this case.

Such circumstances are disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case from the court below, and divided his mistake.

The defendant is subject to criminal punishment for the same crime before committing each of the crimes in this case, or is subject to criminal punishment exceeding the fine even after committing the crimes in this case.

After the conclusion of arguments in the trial, the injured party does not want the punishment of the accused by agreement with the injured party.

These circumstances shall: