logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.11.11 2015고단2414
특수협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 5, 2015, at around 14:00, the Defendant interfered with his duties: (a) worn a urine at the first floor store underground in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) fluoring malodor, and fluoring the malodor, and fluoring it at the food crocner, and fluoring the other customers and employees of the other customers in a large voice, and fluoring the fluor’s marina business by force on the ground that the fluor’s fluort was cut.

2. Special intimidation.

A. On September 14, 2015, at around 10:00, the Defendant threatened the victim E (nivers, 33 years old) who had a path near the new and new office of public telephone in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, by referring to the victim E (nivers, 33 years old), who had a dangerous object, to “bather” (8cm in the blade length).

B. At around 11:30 on the same day, the Defendant, by taking away a sprinking process, which is a dangerous object at the 1st floor agricultural and fishery store underground of the Dmatetegsan store, threatened the victims of f and their names, who are the store managers, with whom the F and their names cannot be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement to F and E;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (report on hearing statements and victim G);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts (a point of interference with business), Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Courses;

1. For the reason of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, Article 48(1)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Terrorism (Scope of Recommendation) is final due to the aggravation of multiple crimes, which are the basic area of types 4 (Habitual Offense, Habitual Offense, and Special Intimidation) and Type 2 (Assault) [Extent of Recommendation ] and the basic area (Habitual Offense, Habitual Offense, Special Intimidation) (Scope of Recommendation ] and the basic area (Habitual Offense, Habitual Offense, and Intimidation) (Act No. 6-1 and 6 months) of the Criminal Act.

arrow