A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On January 5, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of damaging goods for common use in the Chuncheon District Court's original branch on January 5, 2017 and completed the execution of the sentence on March 23, 2017.

On July 20, 2017, around 07:00, the Defendant purchased gasoline 500 meters, which are dangerous goods at D gas stations located in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station in the nuclear power station.

“.........” and threatened the victims.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and threatened victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement by the police concerning L;

1. A seizure report and an appraisal report;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a reply to inquiry, investigation report (netly 16), and text of judgment, such as criminal history;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. While the reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act reflects the defendant's wrongness, and suffers from early illness, the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed as retaliation against police officials. Therefore, the nature of the crime of this case is inferior and the risk is considerably serious in light of the crime, and the crime is committed during the repeated offense period, and the crime is committed during the repeated offense period, and there is a history of criminal punishment for multiple times due to violence inclinations, and thus, the risk of recidivism is high.

In the above circumstances, records, such as the defendant's age, sex, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.