1. The Defendants jointly combine KRW 80,000,000 to the Plaintiff, as well as the period from June 30, 201 to May 22, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 13, 2007, Defendant B entered into a sales contract with the Korea Land Trust Co., Ltd. to purchase KRW 6.415 billion in price for Pyeongtaek-si E-si land and KRW 52,066 square meters in the name of D Co., Ltd. in order to promote the business of supplying soil necessary for Pyeongtaek-si Relocation Corporation in Korea, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the same day after purchasing KRW 1,197 square meters in the name of G Co., Ltd., a company operated by it on March 16, 2010 for the purpose of securing access roads to each of the above lands.

B. The Plaintiff decided to invest in the above soil supply business, and around December 2007, paid KRW 50 million to Defendant B, and recommended to make an investment to Defendant B, who is the branch, and caused I to pay KRW 250 million to the Defendant.

C. Defendant B did not obtain permission from the competent authority for the development of land, including Pyeongtaek-si E forest land E, 121,488 square meters, purchased as above. The Plaintiff asserted that Defendant B returned 50 million won of the Plaintiff’s investment amount to Defendant B instead of Defendant B, and demanded Defendant B to pay KRW 150 million of the Plaintiff’s investment amount, KRW 50 million of the I’s investment amount, KRW 50 million of the I’s investment amount, and KRW 50 million of the investment income.

On April 25, 2011, Defendant B and its wife issued promissory notes in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, each of the issuer, the Plaintiff, the face value of KRW 150 million, the date of issuance, April 25, 201, the date of payment, June 30, 201, the place of issuance, the place of payment, and the place of payment.

(hereinafter “instant bill”) . E.

The plaintiff presented the bill of this case to the defendants on the above payment date, but the defendants refused to pay the bill.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants, the issuer of the instant bill, are combined, barring any special circumstance.