1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section

B. On February 3, 2016, the Plaintiff, as Seoul Northern District Court 2016Kahap39, filed a motion against the Defendant for prohibition of interference with business and indirect compulsory enforcement on the ground that: (a) the Defendant assumes the Plaintiff as the manager; (b) the Defendant controls the access to the part of the first floor underground, and uses it as the office of an organization that assumes the Defendant a false person; (c) controls the access to the part of the common part of the second floor and the fourth floor; (d) changes in the illegal structure of the entire part of the common part of the above floor; (c) was set aside in the cargo elevator connecting the above floor; and (c) the Plaintiff’s manager, sent text messages, etc. to the officials having sectional ownership such as sending them to the same purport as the Plaintiff’s manager who is not a legitimate manager.

C. On July 7, 2016, the Seoul Northern District Court deliberated on the Plaintiff’s application for provisional disposition and indirect compulsory enforcement, and subsequently ordered the Defendant to take part of the provisional disposition that prohibits the Defendant from committing the same act as indicated in the separate attachment list (hereinafter “instant provisional disposition order”). On the above decision, the Defendant filed an appeal with Seoul High Court 2016Ra1386, but the said decision became final and conclusive upon withdrawal of the appeal on November 16, 2016.

The defendant against the plaintiff on November 4, 2016.