logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.11 2016고단2770
변호사법위반
Text

Defendant

A In the imprisonment of 2 years and 6 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant C’s fine of 15,00,000 won, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Each of the Defendants’ respective positions is a person who works as a director of each individual rehabilitation team at the J law Office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from May 2010 to March 201, and at the L General Law Office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from March 2012 to the L General Law Office.

Defendant

B is a person who has been working as an individual rehabilitation team in a comprehensive law office from April 2014.

Defendant

C is a person who has worked as a director of the individual rehabilitation team in the comprehensive law office from July 2012 to May 2015.

Defendant

D is a person who has been working as an attorney at a comprehensive law office from January 2009.

2. From May 10, 2010 to March 23, 2011, Defendant A agreed to accept and deal with individual rehabilitation cases after consulting the clients of individual rehabilitation cases in which the Defendant reported and contacted the advertisement. Defendant A received KRW 1,200,00 as the fees, and submitted the application form for individual rehabilitation, list of creditors, list of creditors, list of assets, list of revenue and expenditure, statement of revenue and expenditure, draft plan for repayment, etc. to the court under the N attorney’s name, including dealing with legal affairs, such as representation of non-contentious cases, legal counseling, preparation of legal relations, etc., as described in the No. 1 to No. 156, May 10, 2010 to handle legal affairs, such as individual rehabilitation, etc., and received KRW 187,200,000 in total as the fees.

Accordingly, the defendant, not a lawyer, handled legal affairs such as legal counseling or preparation of legal documents with respect to non-litigation cases.

3. The defendants A, B, C, andO's co-principal offenders andO are not attorneys-at-law. The defendant A is responsible for the management of employees, fund management, etc. as a whole of the individual rehabilitation team, and the office chiefs, such as the defendants B, C, andO, are individual rehabilitation.

arrow