logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.08.23 2015고정2108
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 24, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s chest on the front side of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on October 24, 2015 with a view to the issue of the victim F (60 years) of taxi drivers and the taxi rate.

2. In the above time and place, the Defendant: (a) committed the above assault by an acting engineer G (56) against the victim G (56); (b) caused injury to the victim, by drinking once he was injured; and (c) caused injury to the victim, such as an inner part, which requires medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant 1] 1. Each legal statement of witness G, H and F

1. Each police statement with respect to G and F [criminal facts of the judgment No. 2]

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Each legal statement of witness G, H and F;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. The defendant asserts that the medical certificate (Evidence No. 9) / [the defendant is merely a fact that F added the defendant and spreads it, and did not assault F as stated in the facts constituting a crime, and that the above act by the defendant is a passive resistance and does not go against social rules.

However, at the time of the instant case

G, F, and H consistently used an expression from an investigative agency to this court that the Defendant was f’s chest or shoulder (G and H “h” in this court, but this appears not to mean that the Defendant’s act was a minor physical contact to the extent that the Defendant’s act was not an assault and assault.)

As the defendant made a statement, as long as it is sufficiently recognized that he assaulted F, such as the statement of criminal facts No. 1, the defendant's assertion about this is without any need to examine any further.

In addition, although the defendant seems to have been tamped with G, it is not likely that such an act would result in an injury such as injury on the face of the enemy.

arrow