logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.01.16 2018고정534
재물손괴
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was the chairperson of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council of Residents' Representatives, and the victim C is the resident of the above apartment.

On January 15, 2017, the Defendant, at around 12:00, instructed the head of the guard team to remove a notice stating that “the council of occupants’ representatives fails to use the management expenses properly” attached to the entrance of the residents without the victim, on the above apartment.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the documents of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and D;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Ethical letters;

1. The notice that the complainant distributed to the apartment and collected, ① the notice that the victim posted on each of the entrances of the occupants in order to inform the occupants of the contents related to the management of the apartment was posted for the purpose of delivering to the occupants, and the victim did not have to recover it;

shall not be a State-owned thing.

② The notice of this case requires that the resident should freely express his/her intent concerning apartment management, including the council of occupants' representatives, while encouraging the resident to attend and interest of the resident in the council of occupants' representatives on the day following the notice, and allowing the resident to freely express his/her intention in connection with apartment management. The defendant, who is the president of the council of occupants' representatives,

Even if the council of occupants' representatives is able to prepare and post a notice that reflects the content, or to present an opinion that reflects the content, it does not seem that there was an effort to minimize damage or an urgent situation where it is impossible to remove the notice from the victim's own discretion without the process of requesting the collection of the notice. The instant notice is posted.

arrow