logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.02.07 2017고정1520
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the Defendant, as the DNA Editor, engaged in the business of editing articles written by reporters belonging to the Defendant and approving the publication of articles on the online newspapers, etc. of the Defendant, and around April 3, 2017, under the title “F” at the above newspaper office located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, G refers to “F” while referring to “F” at the time of carrying out the act, G, the front line number of reporters, is behind promotion compared to the motive of the parallel.

It emphasizes the fact that the victim's promotion was behind the victim's promotion in the following manner: (a) although the number of post officers after the promotion of G was continued to remain in the G class even after being kept in the G class, such as being assigned to the position of a clerk, even after being promoted to the G class; and (b) even after being promoted to the G class, the victim's promotion was not achieved; (c) without special cases or grounds, the victim's promotion should be found in his/her communication capacity for the main reason excluded from the position of promotional personnel and the major position; and (d) in light of the past's quality and ability as manager at the time of the publication of the first day and the performance of his/her duties, various results were reflected, and it was clearly divided into (m) the victim's reputation and performance, and (m) the victim's reputation and performance, and (m) the personnel affairs of the head of G with the intent to defame the victim's news.

2. According to the contents of the article, such as the defendant's assertion, (No. 2, page 18 of the investigation record), the above article was published in D Internet (J) around the above day.

arrow