The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (five months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. As the court below explained in detail, in full view of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case at another time despite the fact that he committed the crime of this case even though he was not only a large number of criminal punishment but also a repeated crime due to interference with business affairs, all of the sentencing conditions in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the sentencing guidelines by the sentencing committee of the Supreme Court, it cannot be deemed unfair because the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (as to the costs of lawsuit, the proviso of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall apply).