The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., theft: 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor; 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor) of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake, that the court below agreed to the victims of the crime of larceny and traffic accident Special Act, that the victim of the crime of violation of the Act on the Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Larceny and Traffic Accidents, that the defendant's life in custody exceeding 7 months seems to have been an opportunity to satise and satise and satise the unity of punishment through confinement life, that the defendant's family and satisfe the defendant's wife against the defendant, that the defendant's family and satisfe the defendant's wife against the defendant, that the defendant's family and sat

However, the thief crime of this case is a theft by driving a motor vehicle not corrected by the defendant, and its quality is not good, and the act of driving a drinking free license is highly likely to cause harm to the life and body of another person as well as his own act of driving a drinking free license.

In addition, the defendant suffered injury from the victims of a traffic accident, and thus requires severe punishment corresponding thereto, and the blood alcohol content of the defendant at the time of the instant case reaches 0.103%, and the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on October 24, 2008 by the Daejeon High Court on October 24, 2008 and sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on June 1, 2008 due to special larceny, etc., and was investigated into the crime of this case on November 1, 2008 after the judgment became final and conclusive, the defendant violated matters to be observed in probation and escaped from Korea without permission for about five years, and the damage recovery was done after a considerable period of time from the date of the crime, and the records of the juvenile protection case against the defendant.