beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant (the representative E, hereinafter referred to as D) was a person responsible for the construction site of G Commercial Complex Building (hereinafter referred to as the “new construction site of this case”) under construction on F in Scheon-si F, the Defendant received advance payment from the above D and continued construction.
1. On July 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stated in the order form of the “PPT807, representative: (b)” in the “PPT 1” column in the “PPT 1” column in the “PPT 1” column in the “PPT 1” book form of the order form of the “PPH” (hereinafter the “H”) in the said G construction site office; (c) stated that the name of the Defendant is the “K, the name of the company: K, the resident registration number: L, the resident registration number: L, the contractor: the relationship with the contractor: the office; and (d) affix the corporate seal of the company to the “B” column in the “B” column in the “PT 2” section under the name of the company; and (e) affix the seal to the name of the E after stating that the “BPT 807, the resident registration number: P: the relationship with the contractor (representative)”.
Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged a copy of the order of ready-mixed, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, D and E, which is a joint and several surety.
2. The Defendant, at the above time and at the above place, delivered the falsified order to Q in charge of H, who was aware of the fact, as if it was actually prepared, and exercised it.
3. Fraud;
A. The criminal defendant against the victim H shall deliver the falsified order form forged at the above date, time, and place to Q in charge of the victim H as if they were genuinely prepared. "The price was paid at the end of the month, and if not paid, it was false to the purport that D or E is responsible for the joint and several sureties.
However, in fact, the defendant used all advance payments received from E, and there was no fact that he obtained permission for joint and several sureties for the payment of the price debt from E.