The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (the imprisonment of six months, the suspension of execution of two years, the observation of protection, the community service order 200 hours, the order to attend a law-abiding driving lecture 24 hours, and the order to attend a law-abiding lecture 40 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment. Each of the crimes of this case is not good in light of its circumstances, circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, and there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment, and considering the means and results of each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, occupation, and environment, and the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case including the defendant's age, sexual behavior, occupation, and environment, the defendant's above assertion by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.