logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.10.14 2020고단2284
전기통신사업법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1 to 10 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 23, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with labor for an offense of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on September 6, 2017.

On June 11, 2020, the Defendant received communications equipment (VoeOIP Gway; hereinafter “VOGG”) from a person who used to use the phone number from a foreign company to a domestic mobile phone number and received a proposal from the Defendant that he would make it possible to use the phone number to be changed to a domestic mobile phone number, and that he would make it possible to use the phone number at KRW 2 million every month.

1. A person who intends to operate a common telecommunications business shall register with the Minister of Science and ICT after preparing financial and technical capabilities, plans to protect users, and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree, including a business plan;

On June 21, 2020, the Defendant: (a) leased the Seo-gu Seo-gu World Financial Fraud Mediation Board (hereinafter “instant Notice Board”); (b) installed two heavy meters and two core chips with the Internet network offered to the said Notice Board using the Internet sharing machine; (c) installed four meters and four core chips from the time additional provision via the Internet line from the aforementioned Non-Name Financial Fraud Mediation Board by installing the 4 meters and four core chips from the time additional provision via the Internet line from June 21, 2020 to June 29, 2020; and (d) installed the above notice board in the above manner as above; and (e) had many and unspecified telephone financial fraud officers abroad from June 21, 2020 to June 29, 2020 to the time of the call call to many and unspecified persons in Korea, the Defendant had connected the name-based telecommunications business to the Internet call number in the name of the said EF number to the Internet call number.

In this respect.

arrow