All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On October 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) entered the said shooting range, while under the influence of alcohol, and assaulted the victim on the following parts of the victim D(31) and the knives of the knives of the knives of the knives, and the knives of the knives of the knives of the knives of the knives of the knives of the knives of the knives of the knives of the knives of the knives, and

B. The Defendant assaulted the victim on the following grounds: (a) at the above time, at the same place; (b) at the victim E (45) this Defendant was prevented from returning home, and soliciting him/her to return home; and (c) his/her face was 3 humping with his/her hand; and (d) he/she was walking with his/her mouths.

(c)

At the entrance of the above shooting range at the time of the above day, the Defendant assaulted the victim of the vehicle by walking the victim at one time due to the victim F (29 years)'s speech to the Defendant.

2. Each of the above facts charged is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victims pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, it can be acknowledged that the victims withdrawn their wish to punish the defendant around January 20, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, all of the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.