Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 23, 2017, when a person violating the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act was prohibited from driving a motor vehicle without mandatory insurance (a two-wheeled vehicle), the Defendant driven a non-registered 500-meter distance from the 400-2 road in Bossan-si, Bossan-si, Bossan-si, the 408 Jeju-si, Bossan-si, the Republic of Korea (U.S.) around 8:13, 2017.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) started without a driver’s license from the 408 Jeju Agricultural Cooperative, the Hamsan-ro, the Hamsan-ro, the Hamsan-ro, the Hamsan-ro, the 1stm of the said 1st of the said 1st of the said 1st of the said 1st of the said 1st of the said 1st of the said

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes regarding de facto survey, driver's license ledger, and mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 46 (2) 2, the main sentence of Article 8 (in the case of mandatory insurance) of the Act on the Guarantee of Compensation for Motor Vehicle Damages, Articles 154 subparagraph 2 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes under Articles 37, 38 (1) 2, and 50 of the Criminal Act (to the extent that the punishment is added up to the long-term punishment of the above two crimes), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is that the Defendant had been punished three times by driving with no license in the past, and in particular, even though he/she was punished by driving with no license around June 2017, he/she again committed the same crime.

However, considering the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive or result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account various sentencing conditions as shown in this case, including the fact that the defendant's mistake is divided.