The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case against the defendant, even though he did not have any 3-4 times or more of the victim's chest part as stated in the facts charged, and he did not have any erobbbbbbling and eroging the victim's chest part as stated in the facts charged, with the victim's erobbbbing with the victim's e.g., the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The court below duly adopted and examined the evidence, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below, i.e., ① from the police to the court below, the victim operation a singing room at his own building, and the defendant could not collect singing equipment without his consent pursuant to the mediation protocol of the lawsuit claiming the name of the building that the victim raised against the defendant, but the defendant could not remove him. The defendant was able to remove him from his rocon. The defendant was 3 to 4 times by her her labbbbbling and her labing with his lab, and her labing with his labing hand, and her labing with her labing hand, and the victim's labing part of her chest from her chest to the court below. ② The victim's labing part of her chest can be confirmed by the victim's labing body, and the victim's labing part of her chest was found to be the victim's labing part of his chest.