logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2020.05.28 2020고단99
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Grand Co., Ltd.

On February 24, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on February 14, 2020, and had D front roads in the YY C go directly from the bend side to the view of tent viewing.

Since there is a road where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, a person engaged in driving of a vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the center line on the right side and prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went into a median line and opposite lane, and the victim E (the 39 years of age, women) who was normally going in the opposite lane was driven by the victim E (the 39 years of age, women) as the front driver of the Defendant vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, from the occupational negligence, the injury, such as “alley dubing off on the left side,” which requires approximately 14 weeks of medical treatment to the victim E, the injury, such as “alley dubing, nearby alleys, and both sides,” which requires approximately 16 weeks of medical treatment to the victim G (the 62-year-old), and the injury, such as “intests, heats, and algos,” which require approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment to the victim H (the 2-year-old), and the injury, such as “the brain dub in which there is no open head,” which requires approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment to the victim I (the 25-year-old passenger of the vehicle).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of witness by the police of J;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Photographs of the accident site;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. CCTV screen business CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (victim I telephone communications and victim G telephone communications);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow