The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant is against the principle of good faith and most agreements with the victims, the sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is against the defendant, and that all the victims except the victim J have agreed.

However, while the crime of this case was committed by the defendant while driving a Ba that was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.158%, without mandatory insurance (hereinafter "the defendant's vehicle"), it was committed by negligence by violating the duty of the front left-way driver's vehicle, thereby causing an injury to the victim's vehicle requiring medical treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, the above Bara driver's vehicle was escaped without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim by immediately destroying the above Bara vehicle and stopping the vehicle, and the victim suffered an injury due to the shock of six vehicles during the escape without checking the situation of the victim's situation even though the accident caused the accident, it is very unlimited liability for the victim's immediately escape. In particular, it is highly probable that the defendant's act of drinking driving alcohol is likely to criticize the victim's age before and after the escape, and the defendant's remaining motive and behavior should be strictly prohibited from committing the crime of this case by taking into account the following circumstances: the defendant's act of violating the order of traffic safety and the traffic safety of the victim.