logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.01.20 2014고정586
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:50 on February 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) started from D’s gallon vehicle in the front of the Gu-si Si, Gu-si, Egallon vehicle, which was parked on the left-hand side of the route while driving in the city, and collision with the G Carren vehicle in F, which was parked on the left-hand side of the route while driving in the city, and (b) was under the influence of distinguishing things or making decisions, and (c) did not take necessary measures to ensure smooth traffic flow and prevent obstacles, despite the stop order issued by the police officer, while driving in the front part of D’s gallon vehicle in the Gu-si, Si-si, Si-si, Si-si, with approximately three kilometers away from the 3-km stop order issued by the police officer, while checking the part of D’s MM7 passenger vehicle back to play on the warning broadcasting of the police officer, which was driven on the front part of the above cargo vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement about K, L, or N;

1. Application of traffic accident reports, photographs of damaged vehicles, actual condition survey reports, and statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 10(2) and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for the mitigation of mental disorders and injuries (In full view of the Defendant’s attitude immediately after the witness was discovered, the medical certificate submitted to the court, etc. submitted to the police officer, etc., it is recognized that the Defendant was in a state of lacking the ability to discern things or make decisions due to unexpected mistake of consciousness immediately after the accident was committed in a state where he was committed in which the police officer was impris

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act for the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence [Consideration of a fine of one million won to be suspended from the sentence, one day of confinement for exchange];

arrow