logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.05.22 2019나38592
임대차보증금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(B) The court of first instance, based on the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court of first instance, did not examine the evidence No. 21, and it is reasonable to view that there was a consent of the parties to the contract at the time of the second lease contract between E, F, and Plaintiff A, a member of the association of this case, and that there was an agreement between the parties to the contract at the time of the second lease contract.

arrow