1. The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants are E’s children. The Defendants are E’s spouse F and children, as well as G (Death on May 14, 199), H, and I, and G had spouse J, children K, L, and M. 2) while a notary public was working for a law firm N law firm’s office, the Plaintiff was able to establish a scholarship foundation only with E visiting the law office around 201 while a notary public was working for a law firm N law firm’s office.

B. “E” donated each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff, and the effect of the donation takes effect on February 22, 201 upon the death of E (hereinafter “the instant donation contract”).

C. After that, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on January 2, 2013 in the name of Defendant C on December 10, 2012 with respect to E’s 783/1,204 shares among the real estate listed in the attached list No. 6 of the attached list.

On April 5, 2013, an authentic deed No. 203, No. 2013 (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”) was written by a notary public that read “E shall give to the Defendants one-third share of each of the real estate listed in [Attachment List Nos. 1 through 5 (hereinafter “E”) and one-third share of each of the real estate of this case and 374 square meters prior to O in Nam-si.”

E. On January 30, 2015, E died, and on March 11, 2015, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on January 30, 2015 under the name of the Defendants with respect to each of the instant real estate 1/3 shares.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3 (including additional evidence) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion E is that if the establishment of the Scholarship Foundation was known, it would lead to the Plaintiff’s intention, and the Plaintiff concluded a private donation contract with the purport that each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet will be donated to the Plaintiff upon his death

Therefore, the defendants primarily share 1/3 of each of the real estate in this case to the plaintiff who is a donee according to the above private donation contract.