The defendant is innocent.

1. A, who is an employee of the defendant, violated the restriction on operation by the Korea Highway Corporation at a point of 38 kilometers in the Young-dong line in Yacheon-si, Yacheon-si on October 19, 2001 with respect to his duties, as well as by the third 12.6, 4 livestock with the 13.1 ton of the 13.1 ton of the 10.0 tons of the 10.0 tons of the 25 tons of the 25 tons of the 25 tons of the B Asia.

2. The prosecutor brought a public action against the facts charged in the instant case by applying Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005; hereinafter “former Road Act”). However, the part that “where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 of the former Road Act due to the decision of the Constitutional Court on Oct. 28, 2010, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 1014, Oct. 14, 2010; 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, and 70 of the same Act, the portion that “if the corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 of the same Act, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the relevant Article” becomes retroactively null and void.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.