logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.11.27 2020고정674
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a freight trucking the events, even though he/she does not take any action after an accident.

On January 23, 2020, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 11:35, and had the driving distance in front of the D-dong of the Seongdong-gu C building in the Gyeonggi-gu, Seoyangyang-gu, Seoul along the direction of the road from the parallel to the original basin.

Since there is a place where overtaking is prohibited, there was a duty of care to make a person engaged in driving service not to overtake.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, and led the victim E(the age of 43) driving at the front side due to the occupational negligence in front of the above intersection, with the front gate part of the driver's car in front of the left side of the driver's vehicle of the victim E(the age of 43).

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence above, escaped without taking necessary measures despite destroying property equivalent to KRW 1,038,487 to the victim’s repair cost.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (ckless driving) at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article by driving a camben vehicle B, and committed a violation of the central cambening method at the section of about 2 km away from the direction of the police station, and committed a cambening driving, such as threatening or endangering a large number of unspecified drivers, or causing any danger to traffic.

3. A person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance for motor vehicles, but the defendant operated the motor vehicle without purchasing a mandatory motor vehicle insurance policy for motor vehicles as described in paragraphs 1 and 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police statements of E;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Written estimate of repair costs;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Inquiry into the enemy;

1. A victim with photographs, such as damaged vehicles, a suspect driver's car fluor video fluor, and a suspect fluore video fluoring related to scambling, and a victim.

arrow