Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B are members of the same Internet 'the next Kafeng' Association.

피고인은 2016. 8. 22. 10:07 경 불 상의 장소에서, 휴대폰을 이용하여 위 동호회 회원 735명이 함께 사용하는 ‘ 카카오 톡 단체 채팅 방 (C) ’에서 위 피해자와 말다툼을 하다가 위 피해자에게 “ 돼지 콧구녕이 하는 짓을 보면 잘 봐줘야, ‘ 보슬 아치, 좀 심하면 ‘D' 좀 더 나가면 'E ’에 속한다는 게 내 생각 임” 이라고 게시하고, 같은 해

9.0. 22:36 At around 10. 22:36, the above victim publicly insultingd the victim 14 times in total, as shown in the list of offenses, by posting the victim as “as far as possible, so far as possible, B may unilaterally see or per se one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by one by another

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness B;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. B accusation and petition;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as police investigation reports (related to data submitted by the complainant in addition to the web domains), data on the screen of the web domains, pictures of the Kakao Stockholm, crime inundations submitted by the complainants, and the screen of the Kakao Stockholm closures;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines, inclusive, with respect to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. The offense of insult as to whether a person constitutes a constituent element of the crime of insult under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is an offense in which a person’s external reputation is protected, which refers to a social evaluation of a person’s value, and the offense of insult as referred to in the offense of insult refers to an expression of an abstract judgment or sacrific sentiment which does not indicate a fact but would undermine a person’s social evaluation.

In addition, the offense of insult is constituted by the patent indication of abstract judgment or sacrific sentiment that might undermine the external reputation of the victim.