The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the imprisonment of eight months, the suspension of the execution of two years, the order to attend a law-abiding lecture 40 hours, the order to provide community service 40 hours) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The blood alcohol concentration in the blood that driven the judgment is relatively high, and the accused has the same criminal records.

The defendant shall confession and reflect his offense.

As a result of the same crime, it seems that only after the punishment for the suspension of the execution in 2005 was imposed, efforts have been made to ensure the long-term operation of compliance.

As above, the court below held that the sentencing of the defendant exceeded the reasonable bounds of discretion, taking into account all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the disadvantage or favorable circumstances to the defendant, and the age, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime.

shall not be deemed to exist.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.