1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual interest from September 8, 2018 to August 27, 2019, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a legally married couple who completed the marriage report on July 29, 1988 and C and one other, and the two children are two children.

B. The defendant was aware of the death in the same kind as C, and had maintained a friendly relationship from around April 2006 by frequently communicating with C.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute between the parties concerned; Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, 14 through 17, 20 (including branch numbers if any; hereinafter the same shall apply); the fact-finding for D Co., Ltd. of this court; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion and C are the couple who completed the marriage report, and the Defendant knew of the marriage of C, and continued to engage in C and Cheating continuously from April 2006 to the present, and as a result, the Plaintiff and C’s common life were considerably infringed, so the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff a solatium of KRW 50,000,000 as damages for the tort above.

B. Around April 2006, the defendant's argument that: (a) around April 2006, C, a facility business operator operating a business in the same Dong Dong Dong Dongdong, first seen C while performing the defendant's house repair; (b) introduced C to the house repair of friendly Gu; and (c) only provided C and personal meals on one occasion; and (c) did not engage in any unlawful act with C and other persons.

The Defendant sent letters to the Plaintiff in 2008 is merely because it was difficult for the Plaintiff to enjoy a conversation while making a c and meal. The Defendant’s writing a letter around November 30, 2008 is due to the Plaintiff’s unilateral finding of the Plaintiff, kneeing, and intimidation. The Defendant’s kneinging against the Plaintiff around August 17, 2018 was merely due to the Plaintiff’s kneeing unilaterally followed the Defendant, thereby threatening the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s intimidation.

C Around November 30, 2018, the fact that the defendant's office was at the defendant's office was requested by the defendant's will to deliver the household.

Even if the defendant committed an unlawful act with C, on November 2008.