The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that the Defendant did not assault the victim, and rather, the victimized person made the Defendant sell his arms over the ground floor.

The victim took a video image at the scene of the assault;

While asserting that he was unable to submit the request of the investigative agency for the submission of the video by the number of rooms, he was unable to do so. The court below found that only some of the pages favorable to himself among the video was closed and submitted, and the victim's 112 report was reported as "sexual assault", and the victim's statement is not reliable, such as the victim's statement about the assault exercised by the defendant is not specific.

Although the court below acknowledged the credibility of the victim's statement and convicted the defendant, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the Defendant used the victim as stated in the facts charged.

We cannot accept the defendant's assertion because it can be sufficiently recognized.

The victim has consistently been under a divorce lawsuit since the investigative agency to the original trial.

I am back to the school where she attends because her husband raises her child and her husband, and she returned to the school where she attends, which the defendant taken her own form as a mobile phone and the defendant took the form of her mobile phone.

Therefore, he also testified to the effect that he saw and taken a photograph by driving away the Defendant to drive away the evidence, and the Defendant saw his hand, which was citing his cell phone with his left hand, thereby falling into the cell phone, and that the Defendant committed an assault, such as breaking the head of the Defendant, etc., who sees the body in order to drive the cell phone.”

The victim is a hospital on the date of the instant case.