1. The part concerning the claim for delay damages in the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant shall enter the attached list from the plaintiff.

1. Indication of claims: To be as specified in attached Form 1;

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. If a lawsuit for future performance with respect to a claim or conditional claim that may arise in the future in the future is lawful, the legal and de facto relationship, which serves as the basis of the occurrence of the claim, must exist at the time of closing of argument, and such status should be anticipated to continue,

(See Supreme Court Decision 200Da37517 Decided June 14, 2002, etc.). However, the Defendant’s obligation to return the lease deposit is not in a state of delay in relation to the Plaintiff’s obligation to deliver real estate as stated in the attached list (the Plaintiff did not properly assert whether the obligation to deliver real estate was performed or the obligation was provided) and even if the Plaintiff brought a lawsuit seeking payment in advance for future claims, it is difficult to view that the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone requires a prior claim for damages for delay against the lease deposit to be returned to the Defendant. Thus, the part claiming for damages for delay in the