logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.11.20 2015나31160
임금
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the member of the party citing the judgment of the court of first instance is required to explain this case are as follows: (a) correction of the " March 1, 2005" of the first instance court No. 12 as " March 8, 2005"; (b) removal of the "large number of 10 pages 19"; and (c) No. 13 as "no disadvantage exists" (see Article 8 (2) of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act; (d) the period of continuous employment for the calculation of retirement benefits is newly calculated from the time of settlement of accounts; (e) the defendant is obliged to pay the retirement benefits that reflects the interim settled retirement benefits to the new bank, which is a retirement pension, when the grounds for the payment of retirement benefits to the plaintiffs in the future, as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, since it is the same as the written judgment of the court of first instance.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are accepted within the scope of the above recognition with merit, and the remaining claims are not accepted as they are without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow