logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.07.23 2015고단237
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 26, 2015, at around 08:16, the Defendant: (a) opened a door-to-door door-to-door operation “E”; (b) opened a door-to-door door-to-door operation by means of any cresh outside of the victim’s leaving the door; and (c) opened a lock-to-door and intruded into the door; (d) around 07:30 on the same day, the Defendant provided the victim as security in lieu of the drinking value amounting to KRW 400,000,000, and the Defendant provided the victim as security and carried one cell phone-to-face owned by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant intrudes on the structure managed by the victim, and took the cell phone device of the defendant who has become the object of the victim's right, thereby hindering the victim's exercise of rights.

2. The Defendant stolen 4 diseases in total amounting to KRW 415,00,00 in the market value of the victim’s ownership at the time, place, and at the same time and place as set forth in the above paragraph (1) with one tool box where the market value cannot be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Investigation reports (Correction, etc. of damaged articles);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, CCTV closure photographs, screen pictures refusing approval for cards, and photograph description of the photograph;

1. Relevant Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 323 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis.

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant committed each of the crimes in this case during the repeated crime period due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and the motive, circumstance, contents, etc. of the crime.

However, it is against the defendant's wrong.

arrow