Text
The judgment below
Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months.
(b).
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the punishment (one and half years of imprisonment, and two years of imprisonment) imposed by the court below on the Defendants is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. Considering the fact that Defendant A inflicted an injury on several victims, the head of the victim by beer disease, while carrying a knife, which is a dangerous object, and the nature of the crime is not good, such as assaulting the victim, and the victim who has failed to reach an agreement is also the victim, the Defendant’s liability for the crime is not weak.
However, the above defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects his mistake in depth, there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the agreement with some victims, the knife with knife, and the knife was used to assault the victim, so it seems that the victim did not inflict an injury on the victim due to cruel knife as a knife. In light of the above defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, relationship with the victims, motive, means and result of the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments and records of the case, such as the above defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, relationship with the victims, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., it is unfair for the court below to hold
B. The circumstances favorable to the above defendant B, such as the confession of the crime and the violation of depth of the mistake, are favorable to the above defendant B.
However, the above defendant was punished for the same crime, and the execution of the sentence was completed after having been sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime for the past's joint residence intrusion crime, and committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period. The crime of this case committed several victims of the above defendant, and written a notice as if he sold articles on the Internet site that trades heavy goods, and then it was from victims.