1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The defendant is an educational foundation established pursuant to the Private School Act with the aim of providing secondary education based on the fundamental ideology of education of the Republic of Korea and the spirit of reading, and fostering of middle figures beneficial to churches and society. 2) The plaintiff Bo's association (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff Bo's association") is an organization that is indicated as the establishment of the defendant's articles of incorporation, and the plaintiff Ao's association (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff Ao's association") is an organization that belongs to the plaintiff Bo's association.

B. 1) The Defendant: (a) the term of office of the G director expires on February 24, 2012; (b) on December 30, 201, the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff A Educational Council to recommend the qualified executives from among the trainees who have served for at least three years, as the replacement of the G director, until January 13, 2012. (b) The Plaintiff A Educational Council did not recommend the candidates by January 13, 2012; and (c) on January 27, 2012, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff A Educational Council again to recommend the qualified executives from among the trainees who served for at least three years until February 6, 2012.

3. Since February 28, 2012, the defendant recommended candidates until March 6, 2012, as the approval of executive officers by the supervisory authority was completed as of February 22, 2012, and the requirements for at least 1/3 of the education career were met. Thus, the defendant wanting to appoint a person recommended by the plaintiff A branch of the plaintiff A branch of the school, and recommended candidates until March 6, 2012.

On March 6, 2012, the plaintiff Ah requested to do so, and the plaintiff Ah recommended the director on March 6, 2012.

4 On June 22, 2012, the defendant held the 175 meeting of the board of directors on June 22, 2012 in order to resolve matters concerning the appointment of directors among the nine registered directors.

In order to be appointed as a director by the defendant, at least 6 members, who are the majority of the number of directors, must be approved. The above board of directors decided by a secret vote on the appointment of the H director recommended by the Plaintiff Ahh Council, and the election of the H director should not be appointed in the second ballot counting regardless of the opposing vote B and the ballot counting result.