1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From January 9, 2016, the above-mentioned A

subsection (b).

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the following facts are recognized in the statement Nos. 3 and 4 of the facts of recognition as evidence:

A. On April 9, 2012, the Plaintiff leased (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to the Defendant as KRW 5,000,000, and the lease period for two years from April 9, 2012, and KRW 1,650,000 (including additional taxes, and payment on the nine day of each month) for rent.

B. On March 24, 2016, the Defendant delayed the payment of the rent from January 2016 to March 3, 2016, and the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a certificate of the content stating the intention to terminate the lease contract, pursuant to the termination clause of Article 4 of the lease agreement that allows the immediate termination of the payment of rent at least twice in arrears.

C. The Defendant did not return the instant real estate until now.

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since the instant lease contract was lawfully terminated due to the Defendant’s delay in rent, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff and pay the Plaintiff the amount of overdue rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to the amount of overdue rent or rent in proportion to the amount of KRW 1,650,000 per month from January 9, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.