All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. As to the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing each of the sentencing) by the lower court, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant is too unfasible, and that the prosecutor is too unfased and unfair.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to have been inhaled by the Defendant, who is a hallucinogenic substance, and the Defendant committed the crime of this case, even though there was a history of punishment once as a juvenile protective disposition and once as a suspended execution, and the crime of this case is not good. Furthermore, the crime of this case was committed during the suspended execution period due to fraud, etc., and the social harm caused by inhaled hallucinogenic substances is serious, the Defendant needs to strictly punish the Defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflecteds the mistake, the crime of inhaled hallucinogenic substances was committed once, and the defendant did not repeat the crime after being treated in the future, is favorable to the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive, means, and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, it does not seem that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.