Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has operated a business with the trade name "C" located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si B.

On April 1, 2016, the Defendant would pay to the victim D additional parts for the manufacture of the Ecocon bags by June 5, 2015, see the preexisting part of the original cost not guilty of KRW 1,149,720, referring to the preexisting part of the original cost not guilty of KRW 1,149,720, and the original cost to be newly supplied by the Defendant.

After the end, from around that time to May 4, 2016, the total sum of KRW 7,504,950 was supplied on credit nine occasions, as shown in attached Table 2 to Table 10.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price of supply even after receiving the above original group.

Therefore, although the defendant deceivings the victim and stated that he/she acquired money from the victim in the indictment, he/she shall receive money from the victim. However, the subject of the fraud crime of this case is clear that the subject of the fraud of this case is the original body equivalent to the corresponding amount, and it is judged that there is no obstacle to the exercise of the defendant's right to defense, so it shall be corrected accordingly.

was issued.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Recording of witness D's statements in the second public trial records;

1. Investigation report - The criminal suspect A's mother and telephone contact;

1. Complaint;

1. The Defendant and his/her defense counsel received a large amount of 6,00 U.S. dollars from a person who was in a false name name on February 2, 2016 or around March 3, 201 and supplied a large amount of f,00 U.S. dollars in a short period from the person who suffered damage to produce them. The Defendant’s and his/her defense counsel asserted to the effect that the Defendant was unable to recover funds due to the failure to deliver U.S. bags to the orderer due to a defect in printing and sealing, and that the Defendant did not have any intention to deceive the victim, and that there was no intention to deceive the victim.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, namely, the defendant had already been liable to a large number of customers and loan companies.