1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. While crossing the road on October 16, 2015, the Plaintiff used a car beyond the left buckbucks by shocking down the left side water and left chests on the floor. On the other hand, the Plaintiff was sent back to the emergency room of the C Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) by the 119 Emergency Squads.

B. The Defendant Hospital diagnosed that the Plaintiff had taken X-ray and CT photographs on the chest part of which the Plaintiff complained of inconvenience. The Defendant Hospital diagnosed that there was no special opinion on the joints of the left part of the joints of the chest, and that there was a possibility of debrising, and that there was no possibility of debrising. Accordingly, the Defendant Hospital provided the Plaintiff with a prescribing the truth control and the preservation treatment, and provided the Plaintiff with a guidance to rebris if the symptoms continue.

C. On October 22, 2015, the Plaintiff continued to have been treated again at D Hospital on and around October 22, 2015, and was diagnosed as a catch catus (3, 4, and 5) catum catum catum and chest catum catum catum catums on the left side of closed, and received treatment until December 31, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 11, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Although the Plaintiff arrived at the hospital at around 11:0 a.m., the Defendant hospital neglected the Plaintiff’s medical treatment, such as scarcity and 13:30 minutes, and caused physical and mental pain, such as finding a cT, which is the cause of pain, through an examination of bones cans for telegraph, and allowing the Plaintiff to receive long-term medical treatment, even though the Plaintiff’s medical treatment was neglected, if there were suspicions about the cT, etc. as to the scarbs that the Plaintiff complained of the scarbs caused by a traffic accident.

Therefore, the defendant, as the operator of the defendant hospital, shall pay 5,000,000 won as consolation money to the plaintiff and delay damages.