logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.04.01 2015고합418
폭발성물건파열미수
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. On June 3, 2015, the Defendant reported 119 of the Defendant’s house No. 106-dong 501, Nam-gu, Gwangju metropolitan apartment house No. 106-dong 301, the Defendant reported that “to explosion butane gas” by using mobile phones. around that time, he combines three copies of portable butane gas into tape on the table with Lers, and prepares one of the two as he lids off, and continuously receives 119 reports, and “to explosion on the surface of the earth” to police officers and guards dispatched after receiving 119 reports.

As a result, the defendant tried to commit the crime in order to cause danger to human life, body and property by burning explosive objects.

2. In order to establish a preliminary crime of explosion of explosive objects, the defendant should have committed an act of preparation with the intent and purpose to extinguish explosive objects.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was sufficiently proven beyond a reasonable doubt as to the Defendant’s actual intent and purpose to defliate carbon gas at the time of the act indicated in the charges.

It is difficult to see it.

(1) The defendant was found to have no intention or intention to consistently explosion butane gas from an investigative agency to this court.

was stated.

② At the time of mobilization by police officers and rifless, the Defendant was in a ward under the influence of alcohol. Before the Defendant’s visit, but but butane gas and rater was on a kitchen deposit with approximately four meters away from the Defendant.

(3) In addition, in order to explosion an butane gas by attaching fire, gas should be leaked by drilling or connecting the devices to the butane gas.

However, according to the witness D's legal statement that was sent to the scene at the time, the defendant is bound to combine three copies of butane gas into tapes.

arrow