The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime, and had no record of punishment more than the suspension of execution.

B. However, the Defendant, while moving the place of residence for about three years, acquired money equivalent to KRW 116 million from eight victims, and acquired money by deceiving the victims by pretending their children or mother's accident or disease. The Defendant also did not agree with the victims, and did not agree with the victims, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) there is no change of circumstances after the sentence of the lower judgment was rendered; and (b) there is no other change of circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing specified in the argument of the instant case, such as the Defendant's age, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the above conditions favorable to the Defendant, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

C. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.