logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.26 2017구합69060
이주자택지공급대상제외처분취소
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 31, 2010, the Defendant made a public disclosure and announcement of the designation of the D Bogeumjari Housing District (hereinafter “instant project”) with respect to the 568,924 square meters of Sungnam-si, Seoul-si, and Cdong Won-dong, Seoul-dong, as well as the said District (hereinafter “instant project”); and the said District “instant project district”).

B. In relation to the instant project, the Defendant established and publicly announced the following relocation measures in accordance with Article 78 of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”) and Article 40 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act:

(hereinafter referred to as “the relocation measures of this case”). - A.I.D. -

Ⅳ A person who, for more than one year prior to the date of public inspection of the district designation (the date of March 31, 2010, the date of public inspection of the district designation (the date of March 31, 2010)) and continuously resides in the housing site within the relevant project district by the date of conclusion of the compensation contract or the date of expropriation and wishes to be supplied with the unauthorized building owner, corporation, or organization constructed after January 25, 89, to be supplied with the unauthorized housing site among those who have received compensation from the Corporation and move to the implementation of this project, who wishes to be supplied with the unauthorized housing site from among those who have continued to own the housing within the relevant project district and have received compensation from the Corporation and move to the implementation of this project;

C. The Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for the supply of a multi-resident housing site under the instant relocation measure, but on February 6, 2017, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a “disqualified person” as a result of the Plaintiff’s examination of relocation measures (unqualified person) in the D public housing zone, and on February 13, 2017, the said document reached the Plaintiff’s resident registration address E (road name address: F in the Sinnam-si, Sungnam-si, and hereinafter “E”).

The disposition of this case is "the disposition of this case", and "the document stating the above contents" is "the case."

arrow