A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On March 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) placed in the display stand in a cresh in Suwon-si C, Suwon-si, where the surveillance of marina employees was neglected; (b) placed in the display stand in the display stand the sum of KRW 18,800, the market price of the victim E, which is the total of KRW 18,800; and (c) stolen goods worth KRW 414,317, total market price, from around that time to April 14, 2017, as described in the list of crimes in the attached Form, by the same method.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of F, G, H, I, J, E, K, and L;

1. Details of stolen goods and details of each theft;

1. Photographss and various theft photographs of each CCTV image course;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (M point employees search and investigation), each criminal investigation report (victim I and E victim's statement hearing related to stolen goods);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for observation of protection;

1. Two types of theft in general property subject to the sentencing criteria (general larceny).

2. Circumstances favorable to the accused shall be as follows:

The defendant is deeply divided and reflected in each of the crimes in this case.

The value of stolen goods by the defendant is relatively small.

The defendant agreed with four victims.

After the defendant's death, it seems that the crime of this case has been committed in unstable mental problems, such as heavy food, food, etc.

The defendant is seeking a preference against the defendant while the defendant's dynamics endeavor not to repeat the crime.

The defendant has no previous convictions of imprisonment.

Circumstances unfavorable to the defendant are as follows:

The defendant has been subject to criminal punishment several times for the same crime.