Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Seized evidence 1 to 18 shall be confiscated.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 30, 2006, the Defendant entered the Republic of Korea with Vietnam’s nationality in the capacity of the national spouse (F-2-1), and the disguised marriage was discovered, and on May 18, 2007, the Suwon District Court sentenced one year of suspension of execution to six months due to the crime of false entry into public electromagnetic records, etc., and forced expulsion on May 22, 2007, and thus making it impossible for the Defendant to enter the Republic of Korea impossible to enter the Republic of Korea. The Defendant was willing to enter the Republic of Korea using a passport issued in the name of another person by means of laundry of his identity.
Around April 2008, the Defendant, at Vietnam, issued a passport with approximately 750,000 won (750,000 won) and the photograph of the Defendant on the part of his name brobeer, and requested to forge another’s passport under the name of another person, and then issued a passport with a photograph attached to the Defendant’s personal information in the name of Cver’s name, which is not related to the Defendant, from the passport issuance agency of Vietnam.
On August 28, 2008, the Defendant continued to be issued a visa in the name of the Republic of Korea (F) in the name of the above D upon submitting documents concerning the invitation of the Vietnamese Family Register, etc. to the public official in charge of the issuance of the above consular visa, as if he/she were invited from the Republic of Korea to the Republic of Korea with the female of Vietnam through the above Bromoer, as he/she had been married to the Republic of Korea with the female of Vietnam, as he/she was invited in his/her mother qualification.
As a result, the defendant conspired with the above Brazil, thereby hindering the legitimate execution of duties concerning the issuance of visas to the above consular official by fraudulent means.
B. The Defendant, around September 10, 2008, entered the Republic of Korea through the Incheon International Airport, presented a visa illegally issued as above to a public official of the Immigration Office in charge of entry inspection to pass an entry inspection.
Accordingly, the defendant is justified in the immigration control office's entry or departure inspection by fraudulent means.