Defendants are not guilty.

Parts of innocence

1. The summary of the facts charged is M & E, Defendant E, Defendant B, Defendant F, Defendant D, Defendant C and Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) established for the purpose of each waste disposal business.

According to the amendment of the Act on Waste Management around the end of December 2007, the Defendants strongly interfered with the need to set the base price for the waste asbestos landfill price with a view to evading the reduction of profit through price competition, as designated wastes from July 1, 2008, the scope of waste asbestos has been expanded and the waste disposal has been possible.

The Defendants agreed on May 6, 2008 to determine the standard price for waste asbestos reclamation to KRW 250,00 per ton through the O’s representative meeting held in Q2, M’s sales headquarters, the representative director of Defendant F, the representative director of Defendant D, the representative director of Defendant C’s T, and U at Defendant C’s optical branch office from July 1, 2008 to KRW 250,000 per ton of the average price for waste asbestos reclamation to be applied from March 6, 2008 to June 24, 2008 through the O’s representative meeting and the business team leader’s meeting, respectively, on five occasions in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached hereto, to determine the standard price for waste asbestos reclamation to KRW 250,00 per ton of the average price, and on the basis of the standard price above, Defendant A agreed on September 1, 2008 to unfairly limit the competition between the Defendants and the remaining Defendants on September 13, 2009.

2. In full view of the overall purport of the records and arguments of this case, the following facts can be acknowledged.

A. 1) The Defendants’ agreement 1) M and the Defendants’ meeting are 5 times in total as shown in the list of offenses in the attached Form from March 6, 2008 to June 24, 2008.